Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

This is supposed to look like a rock wall or rocks in a bed of mortar. My wife says she likes it but doesn't think of rocks when she sees it. What do you see? what can I do to make it look more like a rock wall? Appreciate any and all thoughts, comments, or ideas.

 

rocks3.JPG.9f621dfc658d96c26b53ab90ed2c33a1.JPG

 

 

rocks2.JPG.c185b854b37765c04a5b0ab506442d44.JPG

 

Oh yea, it's a work in progress. Actually, a try piece before  I do this on a larger form.

Honest opinions please.

 

Steve

Edited by Steve Krumanaker
speeling
  • Like 3
Posted

Looks like a rock wall, to me. Lotta time spent, huh? Did you draw it first? 

  • Like 2
Posted

My 7th grade art teacher, who was raised on a farm, said all I could draw were flies.

 

I do see the rocks. Do you think shading the rock areas nearest the "mortar" would make them look more 3 dimensional? 

  • Like 2
Posted

I see rocks with the front 3 in the second picture looking best. I do not care for the Xs on the bottom rings. Interesting concept.

  • Like 2
Posted

It does look like rocks and mortar to me.  I like the idea.  The bottom rings don't seem to fit the theme but then they won't be seen anyway when the bowl is being displayed.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Gene Howe said:

Looks like a rock wall, to me. Lotta time spent, huh? Did you draw it first? 

 

Thanks for reply, I did draw it first but that's much easier to do than a person would think. Basically just a bunch of straight lines drawn in pencil. Shade in where two lines intersect or meet and it creates the "mortar".

 

Steve

Posted
7 hours ago, lew said:

My 7th grade art teacher, who was raised on a farm, said all I could draw were flies.

 

I do see the rocks. Do you think shading the rock areas nearest the "mortar" would make them look more 3 dimensional? 

 

Hi Lew. Thanks for the reply. I did do that some but it's already pretty dark. I made the mistake of making the "mortar" completely black. I like the look but that limits me a little in shading other areas. Not a big deal on this piece as the bowl itself was never a keeper, just working out the kinks on this idea.

 

Steve

Posted
7 hours ago, Gerald said:

I see rocks with the front 3 in the second picture looking best. I do not care for the Xs on the bottom rings. Interesting concept.

 

Hi Gerald thanks. I agree with you on both points. Mostly I just wanted a different "texture" for the bricks. I've never been a big fan of cross hatching and probably won't use that again.

 

Steve

Posted
7 hours ago, HandyDan said:

It does look like rocks and mortar to me.  I like the idea.  The bottom rings don't seem to fit the theme but then they won't be seen anyway when the bowl is being displayed.

 

Thanks Dan, I appreciate your thoughts. Yea, not sure exactly how to terminate the pattern. I think maybe two rows of "bricks" was a mistake and it may look more like a cap with only one row. I have to disagree with you though about the bottom. It seems the first thing people do with a bowl is pick it up and look at the bottom.

 

Steve

Posted
5 hours ago, Stick486 said:

I see an oven...

top of a smelter...

 

 

Thanks Stick. I think that's good?

 

Steve

Posted

Don't know the wall thickness but, maybe some Dremel work for depth before burning? 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Steve Krumanaker said:

 

Thanks Dan, I appreciate your thoughts. Yea, not sure exactly how to terminate the pattern. I think maybe two rows of "bricks" was a mistake and it may look more like a cap with only one row. I have to disagree with you though about the bottom. It seems the first thing people do with a bowl is pick it up and look at the bottom.

 

Steve

 

Put a "Do Not Touch" sigh on that one.:P

  • Like 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, Gene Howe said:

Don't know the wall thickness but, maybe some Dremel work for depth before burning? 

 

Gene, that's a great idea and a perfect example of why a good forum is such great asset. I won't do that on this bowl but I can see that happening on a piece for sure.

 

Steve

Posted
4 minutes ago, HandyDan said:

 

Put a "Do Not Touch" sigh on that one.:P

 

Don't think it's going to matter, wife and daughter both think it looks like a giraffe! :unsure:

 

 

Steve

Posted (edited)

Cut the dark areas about an 1/8 of an inch deeper than the rocks. A flexshaft on a Dremel with a good carbide bit from Wood Carvers Supply I think works the best. The handpiece is small enough to handle easily.     www.woodcarverssupply.com   Only one bit is needed a kutzall #265051.  or maybe a  kutzall #265082  depending on how wide the grove needs to be. These Kutzall bits will last a long time. These bits will leave the surface ruff kinda like concrete looks. If you want the surface smooth which in you case no then a diamond covered bit after you use the course bit would do that.

 

It looks great but needs the extra depth to see and feel.

Edited by Smallpatch
Posted

Hey Patch, thanks for those stock #s. I didn't know Kutzall made grinders that small.

  • Like 1
Posted

I see the rocks too. The only thing I would add is to see if you could not make it a little more 3D, if that is possible.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...